From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21806 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2010 15:50:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 21764 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jul 2010 15:50:23 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100721155023.21763.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/44645] [4.5 Regression] wrong debug info for nested typedef In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "redi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg02224.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 15:50 ------- Am I allowed to confirm my own bugs? doing so anyway There's no difference when using -gdwarf-2 -gstrict-dwarf readelf -wi for the output of g++ 4.5 shows S::ptr as: <1><4f>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_pointer_type) DW_AT_byte_size : 8 which is missing the type, so S::ptr is void* The output of g++ 4.4 and 4.6 shows: <1><4f>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_pointer_type) DW_AT_byte_size : 8 DW_AT_type : <2d> where <2d> is the info for S so S::ptr is S* -- redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-07-21 15:50:23 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44645