public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/44641] Generated constructors and destructors get wrong debug location when a typedef uses a forward declaration of the type before the definition
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100721194049.4224.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-44641-13604@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 19:40 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Despite your remarkably rude response, I've mailed a fix:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01665.html
Don't take it personally. Some of us are not native English-speakers, so we
miss some nuances of English languages. On the other hand, others often use a
matter-of-fact tone that is unintentionally rude. Finally, there is for sure
rude people around. Since it is hard to differentiate between these three cases
without starting an argument, just ignore it altogether.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44641
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-22 22:55 [Bug c++/44641] New: " jyasskin at gmail dot com
2010-07-15 0:35 ` [Bug c++/44641] " jyasskin at gmail dot com
2010-07-20 0:43 ` jyasskin at gmail dot com
2010-07-20 20:17 ` jyasskin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-20 20:22 ` jyasskin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 13:30 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-07-21 16:44 ` jyasskin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 16:50 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-07-21 18:42 ` jyasskin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 18:47 ` jyasskin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 18:48 ` jyasskin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 19:41 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2010-07-27 9:05 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-07-28 6:24 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-04 14:04 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-04 14:20 ` uros at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-04 14:28 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-09 0:19 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-09 0:35 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2010-08-10 22:14 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-44641-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-12-09 14:43 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-09 14:52 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-21 12:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-21 12:38 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-25 20:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-28 16:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-08 20:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-08 20:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-08 20:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-08 10:56 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100721194049.4224.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).