public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/42855] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized * Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:52:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100721235238.12615.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-42855-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #6 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 23:52 ------- I think the thread about the patch became confused. First, Janis essentially approved the testsuite patch. Second, Martin commented that the failure probably was due to MOVE_RATIO not defined. The statement caused some misunderstanding. MOVE_RATIO does not need to be defined and the failure is not caused by a missing definition. The default value of MOVE_RATIO (used by PPC and ARM) cause the heuristic to disable the optimization being tested. If the optimization is not expected to occur on some platforms, then the testcase should be disabled as implemented by the patch or the testcase explicitly should set some gcc param that ensures the optimization will occur on all targets. -- dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-07-21 23:52:38 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42855
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 23:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-01-24 16:06 [Bug testsuite/42855] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-01-24 16:59 ` [Bug testsuite/42855] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 13:08 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 14:56 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-14 18:18 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 17:20 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 23:52 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2010-08-04 19:33 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-05 13:37 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 11:13 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100721235238.12615.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).