From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12667 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2010 23:52:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 12616 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jul 2010 23:52:38 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100721235238.12615.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug testsuite/42855] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized * In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg02294.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 23:52 ------- I think the thread about the patch became confused. First, Janis essentially approved the testsuite patch. Second, Martin commented that the failure probably was due to MOVE_RATIO not defined. The statement caused some misunderstanding. MOVE_RATIO does not need to be defined and the failure is not caused by a missing definition. The default value of MOVE_RATIO (used by PPC and ARM) cause the heuristic to disable the optimization being tested. If the optimization is not expected to occur on some platforms, then the testcase should be disabled as implemented by the patch or the testcase explicitly should set some gcc param that ensures the optimization will occur on all targets. -- dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-07-21 23:52:38 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42855