From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4729 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2010 17:15:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 4601 invoked by uid 48); 25 Jul 2010 17:15:25 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100725171525.4600.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/45017] miscompile with bitfield and optimization In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mikpe at it dot uu dot se" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg02789.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #13 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-25 17:15 ------- is non-standard. For instance, Solaris 10 doesn't have it. Does the test case really require explicit bit fields? Does it work (as in show the miscompile before the fix) with shift & mask operations instead? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45017