public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/45059]  New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed
@ 2010-07-24 18:24 regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
  2010-07-24 19:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: regehr at cs dot utah dot edu @ 2010-07-24 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

[regehr@bethe tmp604]$ current-gcc -O3 small.c -c -fwhole-program
small.c: In function 'main':
small.c:42:1: error: invalid operands in binary operation
D.2852_11 = (unsigned int) D.2845_7 != 4294967295;

small.c:42:1: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

[regehr@bethe tmp604]$ current-gcc -v

Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=current-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/uusoc/exports/scratch/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r162424-inst
all/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/re
gehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r162424-install --program-prefix=r162424-
--enable-langua
ges=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20100722 (experimental) (GCC)

[regehr@bethe tmp604]$ cat small.c

typedef signed char int8_t;
typedef short int int16_t;
typedef int int32_t;
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;

static uint32_t
safe_mod_func_uint32_t_u_u (uint32_t ui1, uint8_t ui2)
{
  return ui2 ? ui1 : ui1 + ui2;
}

int8_t g_2;
uint32_t g_36[7][4] = {
  -1L, -1L, -1L, 0, -1L, -1L, -1L, 0
};

uint8_t g_56;
uint8_t g_269;
int32_t func_37 (const int16_t p_38, int16_t p_39, int8_t p_40, int32_t p_41,
                 uint8_t p_42);
uint8_t
func_1 (void)
{
  uint8_t *l_298 = &g_2;
  func_20 (l_298,
           &l_298 != &l_298 == ~func_37 (func_37 (g_56, 0, 0, g_269, 0), 1, 0,
                                         -1L, 0), 0);
  return 0;
}

int32_t
func_37 (const int16_t p_38, int16_t p_39, int8_t p_40, int32_t p_41,
         uint8_t p_42)
{
  uint8_t *l_55 = &g_56;
  *l_55 |= g_2 < safe_mod_func_uint32_t_u_u (g_36[1][2], 0) | 0, ~p_39;
  return 0;
}

int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
  func_1 ();
}


-- 
           Summary: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to
                    ICE: verify_stmts failed
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45059


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed
  2010-07-24 18:24 [Bug c/45059] New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
@ 2010-07-24 19:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-26 12:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-24 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-24 19:09 -------
Caused by tree-ssa-reassoc.c


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|c                           |tree-optimization
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-07-24 19:09:14
               date|                            |
            Summary|error: invalid operands in  |[4.6 Regression] error:
                   |binary operation, leads to  |invalid operands in binary
                   |ICE: verify_stmts failed    |operation, leads to ICE:
                   |                            |verify_stmts failed
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0
            Version|unknown                     |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45059


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed
  2010-07-24 18:24 [Bug c/45059] New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
  2010-07-24 19:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-26 12:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-26 12:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-26 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-26 12:39 -------
Simplified testcase:

typedef unsigned int T;
extern void foo (unsigned char *, int);

static signed char a;
static T b[1] = { -1 };
static unsigned char c;

static inline short int
bar (short v)
{
  c |= a < b[0];
  return 0;
}

int
main ()
{
  unsigned char *e = &a;
  foo (e, bar (bar (c)));
  return 0;
}


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45059


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed
  2010-07-24 18:24 [Bug c/45059] New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
  2010-07-24 19:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-26 12:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-26 12:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-26 14:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-26 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-26 12:58 -------
Works if b[] has unsigned int type instead of T.
Sounds like a type mismatch.
The VAR_DECL b has ARRAY_TYPE with T element type and b's CONSTRUCTOR has the
same type, but the values in the constructor doesn't have T type, but unsigned
int:
 <constructor 0x7ffff1f2f420
    type <array_type 0x7ffff1f23498
        type <integer_type 0x7ffff1f232a0 T unsigned SI
            size <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d708 constant 32>
            unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d410 constant 4>
            align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff2042540
precision 32 min <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d730 0> max <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d6e0
4294967295>
            pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff1f23540>>
        SI size <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d708 32> unit size <integer_cst
0x7ffff202d410 4>
        align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff1f235e8
        domain <integer_type 0x7ffff2055690 type <integer_type 0x7ffff2042000
long unsigned int>
            DI
            size <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d7d0 constant 64>
            unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d7f8 constant 8>
            align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff2055690
precision 64 min <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d438 0> max <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d438
0>>>
    constant static lngt 1
    idx <integer_cst 0x7ffff202db40 type <integer_type 0x7ffff20420a8
bit_size_type> constant 0>
    val <integer_cst 0x7ffff202d6e0 type <integer_type 0x7ffff2042540 unsigned
int> constant 4294967295>>

When ccp propagates b[0] into the comparison, the comparison uses T on one side
and unsigned int on the other side.  When b has T type, ccp doesn't optimize
the ... < 4294967295 comparison into ... != 4294967295, while when b has
unsigned int type, it does.
T's TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT is unsigned int.
So, it isn't clear if the middle-end is considering the two types as
incompatible or what.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45059


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed
  2010-07-24 18:24 [Bug c/45059] New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-26 12:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-26 14:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-24 17:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-26 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-26 14:15 -------
The reassoc issue is caused by
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159189

BTW, the C++ FE uses T instead of unsigned type for values in the ctor and thus
the testcase works there.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sandra at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45059


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed
  2010-07-24 18:24 [Bug c/45059] New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-26 14:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-24 17:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-25  9:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-25  9:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-24 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-24 17:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=21557)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21557&action=view)
gcc46-pr45059.patch

Untested fix.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45059


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed
  2010-07-24 18:24 [Bug c/45059] New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-08-24 17:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-25  9:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-25  9:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-25  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-25 09:37 -------
Subject: Bug 45059

Author: jakub
Date: Wed Aug 25 09:36:35 2010
New Revision: 163539

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163539
Log:
        PR tree-optimization/45059
        * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (eliminate_redundant_comparison): Strip useless
        type conversions from newop{1,2}.  Assert t is a comparison and
        newop{1,2} after the stripping are gimple vals.

        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr45059.c: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr45059.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45059


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed
  2010-07-24 18:24 [Bug c/45059] New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-08-25  9:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-25  9:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-25  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-25 09:50 -------
Fixed.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45059


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-25  9:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-24 18:24 [Bug c/45059] New: error: invalid operands in binary operation, leads to ICE: verify_stmts failed regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
2010-07-24 19:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/45059] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-26 12:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-26 12:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-26 14:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-24 17:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-25  9:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-25  9:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).