From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11827 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2010 21:56:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 11788 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jul 2010 21:56:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100727215621.11787.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug boehm-gc/34544] pthread_default_stacksize_np failed. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg03015.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 21:56 ------- pthread_default_stacksize_np fails with error EPERM. [New process 12140, lwp 4032369] [process 12140, lwp 4032369 exited] Breakpoint 1, main () at ../../../gcc/boehm-gc/tests/test.c:1797 I think this is caused by the current implementation of __gthread_active_p on hpux. The above behavior suggests an alternate implementation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34544