public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/45070] Miscompiled c++ class with packed attribute on ARM with -Os optimizations (Qt 4.6.2)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100728092203.14966.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-45070-14457@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #8 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-28 09:22 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Thanks for the analysis, yes that appears to be the nub of the problem with the
> result being removed . I see the same problem on trunk - 
> 


I just realized that this is a packed structure and probably need to look up
the semantics of this in the AAPCS. IIRC the AAPCS states that it doesn't
support packed structures or bitfields at exported interfaces. 

Adding Richard for some ABI commentary.

cheers
Ramana


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-28  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-25 23:23 [Bug c++/45070] New: " siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
2010-07-25 23:25 ` [Bug c++/45070] " siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
2010-07-26  8:49 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-07-26  9:33 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-07-28  7:16 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
2010-07-28  7:18 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
2010-07-28  8:37 ` [Bug target/45070] " siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
2010-07-28  9:01 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-28  9:22 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2010-07-28  9:35 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-28  9:46 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-08-03 17:13 ` ian dot bolton at arm dot com
2010-08-14 15:33 ` armin76 at gentoo dot org
2010-08-14 16:28 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
2010-08-19  8:28 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-02 13:06 ` ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-04 16:42 ` armin76 at gentoo dot org
2010-09-07  9:26 ` ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-07 11:08 ` ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-14 14:06 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-45070-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-09-04  9:38 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-04 19:44 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 10:51 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-05 10:55 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-07 10:52 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-07 11:02 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100728092203.14966.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).