From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28107 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2010 15:07:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 26125 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jul 2010 15:07:05 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100728150705.26121.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/45108] Namelist read: Not aborted when reading from STDIN In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg03104.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 15:07 ------- See also: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Extensions-to-namelist.html I understand the support of ? and =?, but why can't one give a proper error is one returns? If one starts a dialog with ? / =?, one stays in the I/O, but if one returns, a proper error should be used - at least if one has never started a ? / =? conversation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45108