public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug debug/45189]  New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
@ 2010-08-05  3:57 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-08-05  9:43 ` [Bug debug/45189] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-05  3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

On Linux/ia32, revision 162891 gave

FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-fastcall-1.C  -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-fastcall-1.C  -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-fastcall-1.C  -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-fastcall-1.C  -O2 -fwhopr  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-fastcall-1.C  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-fastcall-1.C  -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-thiscall-1.C  -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-thiscall-1.C  -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-thiscall-1.C  -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-thiscall-1.C  -O2 -fwhopr  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-thiscall-1.C  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-thiscall-1.C  -O3 -g  execution test

Revision 162881 is OK.


-- 
           Summary: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: debug
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45189


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/45189] [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
  2010-08-05  3:57 [Bug debug/45189] New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-05  9:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-05 14:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-05  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45189


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/45189] [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
  2010-08-05  3:57 [Bug debug/45189] New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-08-05  9:43 ` [Bug debug/45189] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-05 14:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-08-05 15:40 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-05 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-08-05 14:04 -------
It is caused by revision 162888:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00099.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45189


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/45189] [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
  2010-08-05  3:57 [Bug debug/45189] New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-08-05  9:43 ` [Bug debug/45189] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-05 14:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-05 15:40 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-05 16:38 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-05 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-05 15:40 -------
Subject: Bug 45189

Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug  5 15:39:54 2010
New Revision: 162917

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162917
Log:
PR 45189
Unbreak ia64 build after last dwarf2out.c change.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45189


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/45189] [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
  2010-08-05  3:57 [Bug debug/45189] New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-08-05 15:40 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-05 16:38 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-08-05 18:01 ` [Bug target/45189] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-05 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-08-05 16:38 -------
-fpic is broken. On Fedora 13, I got:

[hjl@gnu-15 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./
/net/gnu-6/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-thiscall-1.C
 -mstackrealign -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 -O -c
[hjl@gnu-15 gcc]$ g++ eh-thiscall-1.o 
[hjl@gnu-15 gcc]$ ./a.out 
[hjl@gnu-15 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./
/net/gnu-6/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-thiscall-1.C
 -mstackrealign -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 -O -c -fpic
[hjl@gnu-15 gcc]$ g++ eh-thiscall-1.o 
[hjl@gnu-15 gcc]$ ./a.out 
Segmentation fault


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45189


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/45189] [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
  2010-08-05  3:57 [Bug debug/45189] New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-08-05 16:38 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-05 18:01 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-05 18:05 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-05 18:13 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-05 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-05 18:01 -------
I've now reproduced this on a 64-bit host with -m32,
though still not on the 32-bit host.


-- 

rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
          Component|debug                       |target
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-08-05 18:01:38
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45189


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/45189] [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
  2010-08-05  3:57 [Bug debug/45189] New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-08-05 18:01 ` [Bug target/45189] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-05 18:05 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-05 18:13 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-05 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-05 18:05 -------
Subject: Bug 45189

Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug  5 18:04:58 2010
New Revision: 162919

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162919
Log:
PR target/45189
Fix unwind for i386 stack re-alignment.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45189


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/45189] [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures
  2010-08-05  3:57 [Bug debug/45189] New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-08-05 18:05 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-05 18:13 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-05 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-05 18:13 -------
Fixed.


-- 

rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45189


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-05 18:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-05  3:57 [Bug debug/45189] New: [4.6 regression] New stack alignment test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-08-05  9:43 ` [Bug debug/45189] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-05 14:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-08-05 15:40 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-05 16:38 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-08-05 18:01 ` [Bug target/45189] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-05 18:05 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-05 18:13 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).