public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/45212] New: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(
@ 2010-08-06 19:59 ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-06 20:14 ` [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-06 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
gcc.target/alpha/PR24178.c started to fail on mainline recently:
FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(
The problem is, that we don't generate expected ldl insn, but:
f:
.frame $30,0,$26,0
.prologue 0
lda $1,18($16)
ldq_u $0,18($16)
extbl $0,$1,$0
ret $31,($26),1
.end f
The generated code is similar to what PR24178 fixed, see PR24178, comment #9.
The testcase passed with r161055 [1] and failed with r161806 [2].
In between is Richi's mem-ref2 merge...
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-06/msg02114.html
[2] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg00417.html
--
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler
ldl.*,18\\\\(
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ubizjak at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45212
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(
2010-08-06 19:59 [Bug target/45212] New: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\( ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-06 20:14 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-06 20:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-06 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-08-06 20:14 -------
The problem is, that we enter alpha_expand_mov_nobwx with operand[1]:
(mem/s:QI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 72 [ p10 ])
(const_int 18 [0x12])) [0+8 S1 A16])
This fails "aligned_memory_operand (operands[1], mode)" check.
OTOH, for gcc-4_5 branch, alpha_expand_mov_nobwx is called with:
(mem/s:QI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 74 [ p10 ])
(const_int 18 [0x12])) [0 S1 A64])
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-08-06 20:14:13
date| |
Summary|FAIL: |[4.6 Regression] FAIL:
|gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c |gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c
|scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(|scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45212
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(
2010-08-06 19:59 [Bug target/45212] New: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\( ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-06 20:14 ` [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-06 20:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-09 11:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-06 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-06 20:29 -------
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-08-06 20:14:13 |2010-08-06 20:29:25
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45212
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(
2010-08-06 19:59 [Bug target/45212] New: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\( ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-06 20:14 ` [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-06 20:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-09 11:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-09 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-09 18:24 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-09 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 11:43 -------
Subject: Bug 45212
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 9 11:43:23 2010
New Revision: 163029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163029
Log:
2010-08-09 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/45212
* emit-rtl.c (set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos): Adjust
alignment from MEM_REF offset only if we took it from the
base object.
* gcc.target/i386/pr24178.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr24178.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/emit-rtl.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45212
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(
2010-08-06 19:59 [Bug target/45212] New: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\( ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-09 11:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-09 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-09 18:24 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-09 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 11:53 -------
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45212
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\(
2010-08-06 19:59 [Bug target/45212] New: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\( ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-09 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-09 18:24 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-09 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-08-09 18:24 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fixed.
Confirmed fixed on alpha [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-08/msg00932.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45212
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-09 18:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-06 19:59 [Bug target/45212] New: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr24178.c scan-assembler ldl.*,18\\\\( ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-06 20:14 ` [Bug target/45212] [4.6 Regression] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-08-06 20:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-09 11:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-09 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-09 18:24 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).