* [Bug testsuite/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-12 15:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-12 15:49 ` [Bug middle-end/45266] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-12 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-12 15:46 -------
The pattern doesn't match even though I see two memcpy calls!?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|middle-end |testsuite
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-08-12 15:47 ` [Bug testsuite/45266] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-12 15:49 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-08-12 15:50 ` [Bug testsuite/45266] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-12 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-12 15:48 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> The pattern doesn't match even though I see two memcpy calls!?
>
I am using
# make RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix{-m32,}'" check
2 failures are 1 for 64bit and 1 for 32bit.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|testsuite |middle-end
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-08-12 15:47 ` [Bug testsuite/45266] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-12 15:49 ` [Bug middle-end/45266] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-12 15:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-12 16:44 ` [Bug middle-end/45266] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-12 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-12 15:50 -------
I see the fails, but the pattern should still match.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|middle-end |testsuite
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-08-12 15:50:34
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-12 15:50 ` [Bug testsuite/45266] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-12 16:44 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-08-12 18:17 ` [Bug testsuite/45266] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-12 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-12 16:44 -------
I was wrong. Linux/ia32 has the same regression:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original
"memcpy|(ref-all.*ref-all)" 2
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|testsuite |middle-end
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-12 16:44 ` [Bug middle-end/45266] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-12 18:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-13 12:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-12 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-12 18:16 -------
Pls don't change back bug attributes all the time...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|middle-end |testsuite
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-12 18:17 ` [Bug testsuite/45266] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-13 12:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-13 22:39 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-13 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 12:35 -------
*** Bug 45275 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-13 12:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-13 22:39 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
2010-08-16 17:12 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2010-08-13 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-08-13 22:39 -------
Does "memcpy|(ref-all.*ref-all)" need to be "(memcpy|(ref-all.*ref-all))" or
perhaps "(memcpy|ref-all.*ref-all)". Everyplace else I see a | in a scan
statement there are parentheses around the options.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sje at cup dot hp dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-13 22:39 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
@ 2010-08-16 17:12 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
2010-08-17 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-17 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2010-08-16 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-08-16 17:11 -------
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy|ref-all.*ref-all" 2 "original" } }
worked for me on IA64 where we have 2 memcpys' in the output. Neither of my
suggestions from comment #7 worked. I don't know if this will work on a
platform
which generates the 'ref-all' strings instead of memcpy's. All my platforms;
IA64, PA, x86 seem to generate memcpy.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-16 17:12 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
@ 2010-08-17 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-17 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-17 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 09:47 -------
Subject: Bug 45266
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 17 09:47:44 2010
New Revision: 163297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163297
Log:
2010-08-17 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR testsuite/45266
* gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90: Adjust pattern.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/45266] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
2010-08-12 15:43 [Bug middle-end/45266] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-17 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-17 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-17 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 10:47 -------
Fixed then.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread