From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27418 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2010 07:43:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 27230 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2010 07:42:53 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100816074252.27229.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug boehm-gc/34544] pthread_default_stacksize_np failed. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hainque at adacore dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg01266.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #21 from hainque at adacore dot com 2010-08-16 07:42 ------- Subject: Re: pthread_default_stacksize_np failed. dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: > Because of these issues, I have decided to revert the change on the > branches (probably tomorrow). I will also try to add the stub on > the trunk. Understood, thanks. Sounds like a sensible track to me. We're considering upgrading our system since the patches are pretty old by now, part of a bundle advertised as critical, and our direct set of potentially affected customers is not large. Plus doing it ourselves will get us experience in possible fallouts etc. Cheers, Olivier -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34544