public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/45286] kact.sa_restorer = &restore_rt; in sigaction.c glibc get miss compile with -fPIE on x86_64 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100816111615.30374.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-45286-17238@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 11:16 ------- Re: #c12, the difference is because the source code is different. In the first preprocessed source, restore_rt isn't hidden, in the latter it is. So, in the first case (-fPIE) gcc can't assume __restore_rt is defined in the same shared library or binary, in the latter case it can. Shorter testcase is: extern void foo (void) asm ("baz") #ifdef HIDDEN __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) #endif ; void *bar (void) { return &foo; } asm (".text; .type baz, @function; baz: nop; .previous"); -fpie vs. -fpic -DHIDDEN, the only difference is again: - movq baz@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax + leaq baz(%rip), %rax So, if there is any bug, it is either on the assembler/ld side, or on the glibc side or user side, compiling glibc in a way it was never meant to be compiled. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45286
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 11:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-08-15 1:00 [Bug c/45286] New: " zorry at ume dot nu 2010-08-15 1:02 ` [Bug c/45286] " zorry at ume dot nu 2010-08-15 1:04 ` zorry at ume dot nu 2010-08-15 2:25 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-15 4:41 ` vapier at gentoo dot org 2010-08-15 5:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-15 5:49 ` vapier at gentoo dot org 2010-08-15 20:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-15 20:41 ` vapier at gentoo dot org 2010-08-15 20:46 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-15 21:01 ` vapier at gentoo dot org 2010-08-15 21:15 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-15 21:32 ` zorry at ume dot nu 2010-08-15 21:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-15 21:59 ` vapier at gentoo dot org 2010-08-15 22:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 11:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2010-08-18 3:23 ` vapier at gentoo dot org 2010-08-18 3:29 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-18 3:39 ` vapier at gentoo dot org 2010-08-18 3:59 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com [not found] <bug-45286-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2015-07-04 15:23 ` zorry at gentoo dot org 2015-07-04 15:40 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100816111615.30374.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).