From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22789 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2010 10:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 22755 invoked by uid 48); 23 Aug 2010 10:16:33 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100823101633.22754.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/45382] internal compiler error: tree code ‘call_expr’ is not supported in gimple streams In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg01843.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-23 10:16 ------- As can be seen in inline unsigned long foo () { return 4; } struct S { S (); }; void bar () { typedef int T[foo () == 4 ? 1 : -1]; } S::S () { typedef int T[foo () == 4 ? 1 : -1]; } the problem only happens in cdtors, thus probably related to the cdtor duplication. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382