public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
@ 2010-08-29 15:23 mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-08-29 16:26 ` [Bug bootstrap/45444] " mikpe at it dot uu dot se
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu dot se @ 2010-08-29 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Attempting to bootstrap gcc-4.6-20100828 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi fails in
stage 2 with:
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: In function
'arm_get_pcs_model':
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:3725:7: error: passing
argument 1 of 'stdarg_p' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type
[-Werror]
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/tree.h:4851:13: note: expected 'tree' but
argument is of type 'const_tree'
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: In function
'locate_neon_builtin_icode':
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:18913:22: error:
uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++
[-Werror=c++-compat]
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:17969:20: note: 'itype'
should be initialized
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:18913:22: error: in
'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:17970:13: note: 'bits' should
be initialized
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:18913:22: error:
uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++
[-Werror=c++-compat]
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:17971:24: note: 'codes'
should be initialized
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:18913:22: error:
uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++
[-Werror=c++-compat]
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:17972:22: note: 'num_vars'
should be initialized
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: In function
'arm_output_asm_insn':
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100828/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:22649:3: error: function
might be possible candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute
[-Werror=missing-format-attribute]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [arm.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mikpe/objdir46/gcc'
make[2]: *** [all-stage2-gcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mikpe/objdir46'
make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mikpe/objdir46'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
The first error in arm_ge_pcs_model () was reported 11 days ago as PR45321.
The other 'uninitialized const member' warnings/errors are new since then. I
can't see any obvious recent changes in arm.c that would explain them, so I
suspect they're caused by some C front-end change.
--
Summary: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized
const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++
[-Werror=c++-compat]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mikpe at it dot uu dot se
GCC host triplet: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
@ 2010-08-29 16:26 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-08-30 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu dot se @ 2010-08-29 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-08-29 16:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=21586)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21586&action=view)
preliminary fixes for arm.c stage2 errors
This gets me past the arm.c stage2 errors.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-08-29 16:26 ` [Bug bootstrap/45444] " mikpe at it dot uu dot se
@ 2010-08-30 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-31 8:15 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-30 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-08-29 16:26 ` [Bug bootstrap/45444] " mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-08-30 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-31 8:15 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-01 8:49 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-31 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-31 08:15 -------
confirmed. I was working on fixing this but you beat my patch to it.
cheers
Ramana
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-08-31 08:15:34
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-31 8:15 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-01 8:49 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-01 9:38 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-01 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 08:49 -------
*** Bug 44670 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-01 8:49 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-01 9:38 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-02 11:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-01 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 09:38 -------
The 'uninitialized const members' warning also affects cross builds when
using --enable-build-with-cxx, see PR44670
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |44433
nThis| |
GCC host triplet|armv5tel-unknown-linux- |armv5tel-unknown-linux-
|gnueabi |gnueabi, i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet| |*-arm-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-01 9:38 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-02 11:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-02 12:00 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-09-03 7:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-02 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-02 11:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-02 12:00 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-09-03 7:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu dot se @ 2010-09-02 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-09-02 12:00 -------
Patch has been posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00048.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-02 12:00 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
@ 2010-09-03 7:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-03 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 07:19 -------
*** Bug 45514 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |laurent at guerby dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-45444-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-15 13:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-29 15:23 [Bug bootstrap/45444] New: [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat] mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-08-29 16:26 ` [Bug bootstrap/45444] " mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-08-30 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-31 8:15 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-01 8:49 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-01 9:38 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-02 11:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-02 12:00 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2010-09-03 7:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-45444-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-11-11 9:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-11 10:04 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2010-11-15 13:48 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 13:53 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).