public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/45589] New: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled
@ 2010-09-07 22:25 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-07 22:25 ` [Bug middle-end/45589] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-07 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
On Linux/x86, 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled at -O3:
Running 200.sixtrack ref peak lnx32e-gcc default
*** Miscompare of inp.out, see
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/spec/2000/x86_64/
spec/benchspec/CFP2000/200.sixtrack/run/00000004/inp.out.mis
[hjl@gnu-16 x86_64]$ cat
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CFP2000/200.sixtrack/run/00000004/inp.out.mis
'inp.out' short
[hjl@gnu-16 x86_64]$
--
Summary: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is
miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled
2010-09-07 22:25 [Bug middle-end/45589] New: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-07 22:25 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-08 0:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-07 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-07 22:25 -------
Revision 163963 is bad. Revision 163913 is OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled
2010-09-07 22:25 [Bug middle-end/45589] New: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-07 22:25 ` [Bug middle-end/45589] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-08 0:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-08 0:29 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-08 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-08 00:18 -------
It is caused by revision 163915:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00207.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled
2010-09-07 22:25 [Bug middle-end/45589] New: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-07 22:25 ` [Bug middle-end/45589] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-08 0:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-08 0:29 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-08 6:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-08 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-08 00:29 -------
I used "-O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math" on Linux/x86-64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled
2010-09-07 22:25 [Bug middle-end/45589] New: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-08 0:29 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-08 6:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-09-08 9:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-09 9:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-09-08 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-08 06:55 -------
This pr could be a duplicate of pr45578.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled
2010-09-07 22:25 [Bug middle-end/45589] New: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-08 6:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-09-08 9:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-09 9:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-08 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 09:22 -------
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-09-08 09:22:58
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled
2010-09-07 22:25 [Bug middle-end/45589] New: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-08 9:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-09 9:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-09 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 09:52 -------
Was a dup (fixed).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45578 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-09 9:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-07 22:25 [Bug middle-end/45589] New: [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-07 22:25 ` [Bug middle-end/45589] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-08 0:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-08 0:29 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-08 6:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-09-08 9:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-09 9:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).