From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22350 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2010 06:36:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 18544 invoked by uid 48); 10 Sep 2010 06:36:19 -0000 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100910063619.18543.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/45186] [4.6 Regression] Gfortran 4.5.0 emits wrong linenumbers In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg01297.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-09-10 06:36 ------- Tobias, many thanks for working on this... I mentioned this before in the PR, but it would be very good if some line number testcases were added to the regression tests. Both for performance measurements and debugging, this is essential info, and it is too remarkable good lineno info could 'disappear' from a released (4.5) compiler just like that. If there would be some semi-automatic way of checking the lineno quality (such as e.g. in the original dump line numbers should always increase??), I'd be happy to give it a try on CP2K. Joost -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45186