public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/45636] New: Failed to fold simple Fortran string
@ 2010-09-10 14:48 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-10 15:12 ` [Bug fortran/45636] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-10 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
For this simple Fortran string:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr45634]$ cat pr45634.f90
SUBROUTINE RCRDRD (VTYP)
CHARACTER(4), INTENT(OUT) :: VTYP
CHARACTER(1), SAVE :: DBL = "D"
VTYP = DBL
END
GCC generates:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr45634]$ cat pr45634.s
.file "pr45634.f90"
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl rcrdrd_
.type rcrdrd_, @function
rcrdrd_:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movzbl dbl.1557(%rip), %eax
movw $8224, 1(%rdi)
movb $32, 3(%rdi)
movb %al, (%rdi)
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size rcrdrd_, .-rcrdrd_
.section .rodata
.type dbl.1557, @object
.size dbl.1557, 1
dbl.1557:
.ascii "D"
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.6.0 20100910 (experimental)"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
IFORT generates:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr45634]$ cat icc.s
# -- Machine type EFI2
# mark_description "Intel(R) Fortran Compiler XE for applications running on
Intel(R) 64, Version 12.0.0 Beta Build 20100512";
# mark_description "-O3 -S";
.file "pr45634.f90"
.text
..TXTST0:
# -- Begin rcrdrd_
# mark_begin;
.align 16,0x90
.globl rcrdrd_
rcrdrd_:
# parameter 1: %rdi
# parameter 2: %rsi
..B1.1: # Preds ..B1.0
..___tag_value_rcrdrd_.1: #1.18
movl $538976324, (%rdi) #4.7
ret #5.7
--
Summary: Failed to fold simple Fortran string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
2010-09-10 14:48 [Bug fortran/45636] New: Failed to fold simple Fortran string hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-10 15:12 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 15:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-10 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 15:12 -------
I have a slightly different result with your code.
troutmask:sgk[212] gfc4x -c -O g.f90
g.f90: In function 'rcrdrd':
g.f90:1:0: internal compiler error: in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1218
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
If I replace the SAVE attribute by PARAMETER (which will most
likely cause the folding you want), everything compiles fine.
The ICE also goes away if I increase the length of DBL from
one to any larger value.
troutmask:sgk[219] gfc4x -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/sgk/work/4x/bin/gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/home/sgk/work/4x/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0
Configured with: ../gcc4x/configure --prefix=/home/sgk/work/4x
--enable-languages=c,fortran --disable-libmudflap --disable-bootstrap
--with-quad=/home/sgk/work
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20100909 (experimental) (GCC)
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
2010-09-10 14:48 [Bug fortran/45636] New: Failed to fold simple Fortran string hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-10 15:12 ` [Bug fortran/45636] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-10 15:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 15:33 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-10 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 15:20 -------
The -fdump-tree-original for HJ's original code look like
rcrdrd (character(kind=1)[1:4] & restrict vtyp, integer(kind=4) _vtyp)
{
static character(kind=1) dbl[1:1] = "D";
(MEM[(c_char * {ref-all})vtyp] = MEM[(c_char * {ref-all})&dbl];, (void *)
vtyp;);
__builtin_memset ((void *) vtyp + 1, 32, 3);
}
If I increase the length of DBL to 2, then the dump looks like
rcrdrd (character(kind=1)[1:4] & restrict vtyp, integer(kind=4) _vtyp)
{
static character(kind=1) dbl[1:2] = "D ";
__builtin_memmove ((void *) vtyp, (void *) &dbl, 2);
__builtin_memset ((void *) vtyp + 2, 32, 2);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
2010-09-10 14:48 [Bug fortran/45636] New: Failed to fold simple Fortran string hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-10 15:12 ` [Bug fortran/45636] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 15:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-10 15:33 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-10 15:34 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-10 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-10 15:32 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have a slightly different result with your code.
>
> troutmask:sgk[212] gfc4x -c -O g.f90
> g.f90: In function 'rcrdrd':
> g.f90:1:0: internal compiler error: in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1218
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>
>
It is fixed by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00475.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
2010-09-10 14:48 [Bug fortran/45636] New: Failed to fold simple Fortran string hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-10 15:33 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-10 15:34 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-10 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 15:34 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I have a slightly different result with your code.
> >
> > troutmask:sgk[212] gfc4x -c -O g.f90
> > g.f90: In function 'rcrdrd':
> > g.f90:1:0: internal compiler error: in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1218
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> >
> >
>
> It is fixed by
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00475.html
>
HJ,
Thanks. I updated by trunk right before your patch,
so I missed it my most recent build.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
2010-09-10 14:48 [Bug fortran/45636] New: Failed to fold simple Fortran string hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-10 15:34 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-10 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-10 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 15:47 -------
For arbitrary lengths (both of the constant string and of the padding) the
memmove (which will be optimized to memcpy as the source is read-only) + memset
is the best thing to do, replacing say
memmove (x, "900 bytes long string", 900);
memset (x + 900, ' ', 100);
would be very .rodata size unfriendly.
So, the question is, do we want to optimize this for very small sizes of both
(what sizes? Should we call can_store_by_pieces to determine that from the
FE?)
in the FE by transforming that say
memmove (x, "ABCDE", 5);
memset (x + 5, ' ', 3);
into
memcpy (x, "ABCDE ", 8);
or should we do this generically in the middle-end, where we'd do this
transformation for such cases even for other languages?
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-09-27 11:07 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-12 22:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-09-27 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2010.09.27 06:16:20
date| |
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-09-27 06:16:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 21891 [details]
> patch for comment#5
>
> This patch fixes the issue in comment #5 in the Fortran front end.
... but also causes regressions. I'll investigate.
Confirmed, BTW.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-09-27 11:07 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-10-12 22:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-16 18:59 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-12 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-12 22:01:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 12 22:01:04 2010
New Revision: 165401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165401
Log:
PR fortran/45636
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c: Include expr.h.
(constant_pointer_difference, simplify_builtin_call): New functions.
(tree_ssa_forward_propagate_single_use_vars): Call
simplify_builtin_call on builtin calls.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/Makefile.in
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-09-27 11:07 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-12 22:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-10-16 18:59 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-17 15:42 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-16 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-16 18:58:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 22064
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22064
Tree dump.
gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90 fails on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. Tree dump
attached.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-10-16 18:59 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-10-17 15:42 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
2010-10-28 17:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca @ 2010-10-17 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-17 15:41:54 UTC ---
In addition, although gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c doesn't fail on
hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, it does fail on hpux:
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c -w -O0 -lm
-o /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gcc/pr45636.x0 (timeout = 300)
/usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols:
mempcpy (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccT7jpSk.o) (code)
Looking at the hppa-linux .s, there are still many calls to various 'mem*'
functions. I don't see any on x86.
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-10-17 15:42 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
@ 2010-10-28 17:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-05 21:13 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-28 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-28 17:54:17 UTC ---
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c also fails on Solaris 2/SPARC:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c compilation, -Os
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c execution, -Os
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
mempcpy /var/tmp//ccJduPWN.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
/var/gcc/regression/trunk/10-gcc-gas/build/gcc/testsuite/gcc2/pr45636.x7
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-10-28 17:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-05 21:13 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
2010-11-07 7:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp.com @ 2010-11-05 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #13 from Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp.com> 2010-11-05 21:12:19 UTC ---
I have moved gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c to gcc.dg/torture/pr45636.c
and added a check for the mempcpy function so this should not fail on HP-UX or
Solaris which don't have a mempcpy function.
The change was r166378 and if the test failures are the only reason to keep
this bug report open then it we should be able to close it now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-05 21:13 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
@ 2010-11-07 7:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:44 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-07 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|danglin at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #24 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-07 07:46:24 UTC ---
remove Danglin to avoid mail spamage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-07 7:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-07 19:44 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
2010-11-08 16:08 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca @ 2010-11-07 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
--- Comment #25 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-07 19:44:07 UTC ---
> The change was r166378 and if the test failures are the only reason to keep
> this bug report open then it we should be able to close it now.
Closing would be ok if there is a reason the call to mempcpy shouldn't
be eliminated. On darwin, it was eliminated.
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-07 19:44 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
@ 2010-11-08 16:08 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
2010-11-23 23:53 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 1:09 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp.com @ 2010-11-08 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #26 from Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp.com> 2010-11-08 16:08:19 UTC ---
The mempcpy is not inlined with -Os. Presumbably because that would increase
the size of the resulting object.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-08 16:08 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
@ 2010-11-23 23:53 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 1:09 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-23 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #27 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-23 23:45:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> The mempcpy is not inlined with -Os. Presumbably because that would increase
> the size of the resulting object.
Possibly, but based on Rainer's comment, the issue would appear to
affect targets with strict alignment.
Sorry for the mail spamage. It was caused by a hardware failure at NRC.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-23 23:53 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-24 1:09 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-24 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #28 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-24 00:26:15 UTC ---
Sorry, I didn't intend to reopen. The web interface seems to
unexpected change fields sometimes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-24 0:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-10 14:48 [Bug fortran/45636] New: Failed to fold simple Fortran string hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-10 15:12 ` [Bug fortran/45636] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 15:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 15:33 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-10 15:34 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 15:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-45636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-09-27 11:07 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-12 22:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-16 18:59 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-17 15:42 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
2010-10-28 17:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-05 21:13 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
2010-11-07 7:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:44 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
2010-11-08 16:08 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
2010-11-23 23:53 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 1:09 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).