public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/45604]  New: [4.6 regression] New test failures
@ 2010-09-09  0:32 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-09-09  9:49 ` [Bug testsuite/45604] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-09  0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

On Linux/x86, revision 164033 gave

FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr30965.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized "variable_..D. =
v_..D." 2
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pointer-reference-alias.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized
"\*a" 1
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr27090.C scan-tree-dump optimized "f_..D.->x;"

Revision 164022 is OK.  It may be caused by revision 164031:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00323.html


-- 
           Summary: [4.6 regression] New test failures
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: testsuite
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45604


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/45604] [4.6 regression] New test failures
  2010-09-09  0:32 [Bug testsuite/45604] New: [4.6 regression] New test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-09  9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-09-09 18:07 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-09  9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45604


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/45604] [4.6 regression] New test failures
  2010-09-09  0:32 [Bug testsuite/45604] New: [4.6 regression] New test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-09-09  9:49 ` [Bug testsuite/45604] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-09 18:07 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-09-13  3:42 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-09-13  4:58 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-09 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-09 18:07 -------
Mine, thanks, testing a patch.  Sorry about the breakage, I seem to have
compared test results with a baseline that already had the errors :-(


-- 

aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-09-09 18:07:11
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45604


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/45604] [4.6 regression] New test failures
  2010-09-09  0:32 [Bug testsuite/45604] New: [4.6 regression] New test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-09-09  9:49 ` [Bug testsuite/45604] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-09-09 18:07 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-13  3:42 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-09-13  4:58 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-13  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-13 03:42 -------
Subject: Bug 45604

Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Sep 13 03:42:07 2010
New Revision: 164242

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164242
Log:
PR debug/45604
PR debug/45419
PR debug/45408
* tree-pretty-print.c (dump_generic_node): Disregard top-level
types of MEM_REF pointer types to the same type.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/tree-pretty-print.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45604


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/45604] [4.6 regression] New test failures
  2010-09-09  0:32 [Bug testsuite/45604] New: [4.6 regression] New test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-09-13  3:42 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-13  4:58 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-13  4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-13 04:58 -------
Fixed


-- 

aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45604


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/45604] [4.6 regression] New test failures
       [not found] <bug-45604-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-10-08  4:41 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-08  4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45604

--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-08 04:41:08 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Oct  8 04:40:59 2010
New Revision: 165149

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165149
Log:
PR debug/45673
PR debug/45604
PR debug/45419
PR debug/45408
* tree-pretty-print.c (dump_generic_node): Explicitly dump the
type of MEM_REFs to INTEGER_CSTs.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/tree-pretty-print.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-08  4:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-09  0:32 [Bug testsuite/45604] New: [4.6 regression] New test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-09-09  9:49 ` [Bug testsuite/45604] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-09 18:07 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-13  3:42 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-13  4:58 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-45604-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-08  4:41 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).