public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/33970] Missed optimization using unsigned char loop variable
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100913120912.12626.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-33970-15294@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #12 from abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com  2010-09-13 12:09 -------
I have verified the attached test case and test case with other comments and
found the code generated is correct i.e. the variable is not promoted to
integer in gcc-4.3.3, gcc-4.4.3, gcc-4.5.0 and also the latest head. 
The assembly for the following piece of code:

int sub2(unsigned char); // external function

void foo(void) {
  unsigned char x;
  for(x=0;x<128; x++)
  {
   sub2(x); //x is becomes a int (16bit)
   // sub2(x+1); //x is char (8bit)
  }
}
in gcc-4.3.3 is:
foo:
    push r17
/* prologue: function */
/* frame size = 0 */
    ldi r17,lo8(0)
.L2:
    mov r24,r17
    rcall sub2
    subi r17,lo8(-(1))
    cpi r17,lo8(-128)
    brne .L2
/* epilogue start */
    pop r17
    ret
    .size   foo, .-foo


-- 

abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |abnikant dot singh at atmel
                   |                            |dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33970


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-13 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-01 13:44 [Bug c/33970] New: " henning dot m at insightbb dot com
2007-11-01 14:10 ` [Bug c/33970] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-01 17:09 ` [Bug middle-end/33970] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-01 17:28 ` eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com
2007-11-01 17:45 ` eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com
2007-11-01 17:47 ` eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com
2007-11-01 21:26 ` henning dot m at insightbb dot com
2007-11-04 23:28 ` eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com
2007-11-04 23:28 ` eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com
2007-11-05 22:48 ` wvangulik at xs4all dot nl
2007-11-06 12:37 ` henning dot m at insightbb dot com
2007-11-06 19:35 ` wvangulik at xs4all dot nl
2007-11-06 21:01 ` wvangulik at xs4all dot nl
2010-09-13 12:09 ` abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com [this message]
     [not found] <bug-33970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-07-20 17:48 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100913120912.12626.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).