From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28424 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2010 19:10:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 28309 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2010 19:09:59 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100915190959.28308.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/45605] Missed devirtualization In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenther at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg01770.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-09-15 19:09 ------- Subject: Re: Missed devirtualization On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 18:42 ------- > Well, it turns out that fold_stmt_1 is never called on that statement > (neither with -O -finline or -O2 or -O3). Where is it supposed to be > called from? We fold a stmt only if it is propagated to (by ccp, copyprop, forwprop, dom or by inlining). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45605