public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100916130941.5291.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-45689-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-09-16 13:09 -------
MAXLOC and MINLOC are also missing (see pr25104).

> They are not, as there, afaik, are no simplifiers yet.
>
> Hence, with your patch they will be accepted, but you'd end up with wrong code
> at the end, as the functions are not properly simplified and thus not constant.

I have seen that, and also in gcc/fortran/simplify.c

    /* FIXME: Returning here avoids a regression in array_simplify_1.f90.
       Replace NULL with gcc_unreachable() after implementing
       gfc_simplify_cshift(). */

Am I correct to understand that the current situation (i.e. the error message)
is a temporary fix for some missing gfc_simplify_*?


-- 

dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|CSHIFT and EOSHIFT are not  |[F2003] Missing
                   |in the trans_func_f2003 list|transformational intrinsic
                   |                            |in the trans_func_f2003 list


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-16 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-16 10:41 [Bug fortran/45689] New: CSHIFT and EOSHIFT are not in the make-164314p7m1.log list dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-09-16 10:42 ` [Bug fortran/45689] CSHIFT and EOSHIFT are not in the trans_func_f2003 list dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-09-16 11:14 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-16 13:09 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr [this message]
2010-09-18 15:58 ` [Bug fortran/45689] [F2003] Missing transformational intrinsic " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-45689-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-06-25 17:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-25 17:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-25 17:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100916130941.5291.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).