public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug preprocessor/45319]  New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90
@ 2010-08-18 14:19 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-18 14:32 ` [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-18 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Executing on host: /mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
/mnt/
gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90 
-B/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/hp
pa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp/
-B/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./lib
gomp/.libs -I/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp
-I/mnt/gnu/gcc/
gcc/libgomp/testsuite/.. -fmessage-length=0 -fopenmp  -O0  
-B/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdi
r/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp/../libgfortran/.libs  
-L/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/h
ppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp/.libs -lgomp
-L/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hp
ux11.11/./libgomp/../libgfortran/.libs -lgfortran -lm   -o ./vla4.exe   
(timeou
t = 300)
/mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90: In function 'foo':
/mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90:96:0: warning:
barri
er region may not be closely nested inside of work-sharing, critical, ordered,
m
aster or explicit task region
output is:
/mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90: In function 'foo':
/mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90:96:0: warning:
barri
er region may not be closely nested inside of work-sharing, critical, ordered,
m
aster or explicit task region

FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90  -O0   (test for warnings, line 97)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
/mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90:96:0: warning:
barri
er region may not be closely nested inside of work-sharing, critical, ordered,
m
aster or explicit task region

Appears warning points to wrong line number.


-- 
           Summary: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: preprocessor
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45319


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90
  2010-08-18 14:19 [Bug preprocessor/45319] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-18 14:32 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-30 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-09-21  9:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-18 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-18 14:32 -------
Similar fails:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.35.4.f90  -O   (test for warnings, line 11)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.35.4.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.35.4.f90:9:0:
warni
ng: barrier region may not be closely nested inside of work-sharing, critical,
o
rdered, master or explicit task region

FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla5.f90  -O0   (test for warnings, line 69)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla5.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/vla5.f90:68:0: warning:
barri
er region may not be closely nested inside of work-sharing, critical, ordered,
m
aster or explicit task region


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45319


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90
  2010-08-18 14:19 [Bug preprocessor/45319] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-18 14:32 ` [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-30 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-09-21  9:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-30 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45319


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90
  2010-08-18 14:19 [Bug preprocessor/45319] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-18 14:32 ` [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-30 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-21  9:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-21  9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-21 09:28 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Similar fails:
> FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla5.f90  -O0   (test for warnings, line 69)
> FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla5.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> libgomp.fortran/vla5.f90:68:0: warning:
> barrier region may not be closely nested inside of work-sharing, critical,
> ordered, master or explicit task region

That is: The warning is in line 68 instead of 69.

Does this still occur? I could imagine that the input-location fixes solved
this issue, but maybe it didn't.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45319


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90
       [not found] <bug-45319-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2010-10-21 12:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-10-21 15:53 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-21 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45319

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-21 15:53:25 UTC ---
I agree.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90
       [not found] <bug-45319-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-10-21 12:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-10-21 15:53 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-21 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45319

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-21 12:57:16 UTC ---
*ping*

(In reply to comment #2)
> Does this still occur?

I tried to find those failures in the last hppa test result - but I could not.

Currently, I only see failures due to PR45505 and a -O3
gfortran.dg/forall_7.f90 failure in the last hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 run.

Thus, I am inclined to close this PR as RESOLVE - WORKSFORME. Comments?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-21 15:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-18 14:19 [Bug preprocessor/45319] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-18 14:32 ` [Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-30 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-21  9:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-45319-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-21 12:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-21 15:53 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).