From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-332081-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31022 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2010 22:10:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 31011 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2010 22:10:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:10:16 +0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/45791] Missed devirtualization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
In-Reply-To: <bug-45791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:33:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg02805.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20100926033300.PeqcCGtB-xh6-6Iu3vsFWO8chJLT0ndjF1DOArloAoA@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791

--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-09-25 22:10:15 UTC ---
Hmm,
normally we should see it from COMPONENT_REF:
  while (true)
    {
      if (TREE_CODE (ref) == COMPONENT_REF)
        {
          tree par_type;
          tree binfo, base_binfo;
          tree field = TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1);

          if (!DECL_ARTIFICIAL (field))
            {
              tree type = TREE_TYPE (field);
              if (TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE)
                return TYPE_BINFO (type);
              else
                return NULL_TREE;
            }
but we don't since it has DECL_ARTIFICIAL set.  What is the logic here?
Also what about i.e. ARRAY_REF and arrays of objects and COMPONENT_REFs
translated to MEM_REFs?

Honza