From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-332084-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 547 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2010 22:17:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 537 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2010 22:17:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:17:43 +0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/45791] Missed devirtualization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
In-Reply-To: <bug-45791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 06:02:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg02808.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20100926060200.aRbf4mATTgMIydrXRsbuCA2o0k8iF4UbjyPiECWYedk@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791

--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-09-25 22:17:41 UTC ---
Another testcase where we devirtualize via folding is:
// { dg-do assemble  }
// { dg-options "-g -O2" }

//  Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
//  Contributed by Nathan Sidwell 21 Nov 1999 <nathan@acm.org>

// This causes assember relocation errors

struct X
{
  virtual ~X () {}
};

struct Y
{
  Y (){};
};

void foo ()
{
  X *x = new X;
  x->~X ();
  Y ys[2];
}

compiled with -O2 we get
  x_3 = operator new (8);
  # DEBUG this => x_3
  x_3->_vptr.X = &_ZTV1X[2];
  # DEBUG x => x_3 
  D.2142_7 = (int (*__vtbl_ptr_type) (void)) __comp_dtor ;
  OBJ_TYPE_REF(D.2142_7;x_3->0) (x_3);
that gets folded only in ccp3. We need FRE to fold:
  x_3->_vptr.X = &_ZTV1X[2];
  # DEBUG x => x_3
  D.2141_6 = &_ZTV1X[2];
  D.2142_7 = *D.2141_6;
  OBJ_TYPE_REF(D.2142_7;x_3->0) (x_3);
into
  x_3 = operator new (8);
  # DEBUG this => x_3
  x_3->_vptr.X = &_ZTV1X[2];
  # DEBUG x => x_3
  D.2141_6 = x_3->_vptr.X;
  D.2142_7 = *D.2141_6;
  OBJ_TYPE_REF(D.2142_7;x_3->0) (x_3);