From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25335 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2010 18:24:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 25320 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2010 18:24:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:24:52 +0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/45896] [C++0x] Facet time_get not reading dates according to the IEEE 1003 standard. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Component In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00429.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101005182400.f0RtaANoRJPiTLlUY-04wOnIT3nc7leX11Pul8mcSRw@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |paolo.carlini at oracle dot | |com Component|c++ |libstdc++ --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-05 18:24:44 UTC --- Actually, adding this sort of flexibility then hits http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#461. Better dealing with this as part of a more general review of time_get for C++0x.