From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32511 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2010 19:37:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 32501 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2010 19:37:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:37:25 +0000 From: "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/33097] Function decl trees without proper argument list X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: FIXME X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:37:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101006193700.v5fWZSVL36Zf5w77n4AhB1EJW5XWnoIG03PFrSXpS2k@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33097 Jack Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |howarth at nitro dot | |med.uc.edu --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2010-10-06 19:37:20 UTC --- FYI, this PR apparently causes all of the remaining Polyhedron 2005 benchmark compile failures when building with gcc 4.5.2 using the current dragonegg 2.8 plugin... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-October/035255.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-October/035256.html While fixing this PR might not be particularly helpful in stock gcc trunk, it would greatly enhance dragonegg's usefulness under the same.