From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-333534-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23404 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2010 18:40:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 23391 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2010 18:40:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:40:47 +0000
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/45791] Missed devirtualization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
In-Reply-To: <bug-45791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:40:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00923.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20101011184000.EqFQpNWoL2ivNz27iXUXFtlpPpUVMxMk2wP9zUuKKDg@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791

--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-11 18:40:42 UTC ---
And by the way, I'm afraid we really need to somehow address PR 45934
before we attempt to fold more O_T_Rs coming from
constructors/destructors.