From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-333540-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9898 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2010 19:18:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 9888 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2010 19:18:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID,TW_BJ
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:18:57 +0000
From: "siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
In-Reply-To: <bug-32820-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-32820-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:18:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00929.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20101011191800.6TJrdDY5JuH39R9HwOVzEDJ82XqLAR85revA52HXP58@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820

Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |siarhei.siamashka at gmail
                   |                            |dot com

--- Comment #7 from Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com> 2010-10-11 19:18:46 UTC ---
Looks like this or similar "Variables in Specified Registers" bug is also
reproducible on ARM with gcc 4.5.1

$ cat test.c

int f(int a)
{
  register int result asm("r0");
  asm (
    "add    r0, %[a], #123\n"
    : [result] "=&r" (result)
    : [a]      "r"   (a)
  );
  return result;
}

$ gcc -O2 -c test.c
$ objdump -d test.o

00000000 <f>:
   0:   e280007b        add     r0, r0, #123    ; 0x7b
   4:   e1a00003        mov     r0, r3
   8:   e12fff1e        bx      lr

Here the local variable 'result' gets assigned to register r3 instead of r0
causing all kind of problems.