public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mrs at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug objc/45878] [4.6 Regression] Can't compile even a trivial ObjC program with -fexceptions -O2
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012163800.xrVU8NAfx8kY04hlM-ouOs0JLfQYUWq_VXaoSSx7Buc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-45878-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45878

--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-12 16:38:16 UTC ---
I think the patch that broke this should be backed out until the semantics are
sorted out.  I think the middle-end people should decide on which part of the
compiler is wrong, how to make the other-side conform and then change the
documentation to make it clear.  Once that is done, the side that is wrong
should be fixed, once that is done, the patch can then be reenabled.

So far, it sounds like a ME problem to me.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-12 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-03 23:56 [Bug objc/45878] New: " nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-04  7:32 ` [Bug objc/45878] [4.6 Regression] " iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-04  9:25 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-04 10:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-12 16:03 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-12 16:38 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2010-10-12 16:40 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 13:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 14:26 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 15:05 ` nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 15:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2010-10-13 15:27 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 15:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 16:59 ` nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 18:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 18:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 18:48 ` nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 20:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-13 20:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101012163800.xrVU8NAfx8kY04hlM-ouOs0JLfQYUWq_VXaoSSx7Buc@z \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).