public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101013214200.8bYcwAb8etf4klm49vXoSJznrV38LV0v_JJGsuXtt5Y@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-46010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jvdelisle at gcc dot
                   |                            |gnu.org
            Summary|reading of structure        |I/O: Namelist-reading bug
      Known to fail|                            |4.2.4, 4.6.0

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-13 21:42:19 UTC ---
Jerry, can you have a look?

The first 12 items look OK (cf. "fort.11") if one compiles with NAG or ifort.
With gfortran, the items 1 looks OK, two has garbage, three looks OK - but has
the short/long name belonging to item 2 etc.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-13 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-13 20:59 [Bug fortran/46010] New: reading of structure marco at hulten dot org
2010-10-13 21:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2010-10-14  3:20 ` [Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-14  3:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-14  8:09 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-14 18:16 ` marco at hulten dot org
2010-10-14 19:13 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-25  5:48 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-25 13:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-26  1:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-26  9:13 ` marco at hulten dot org
2010-10-26 19:05 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-26 19:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-26 19:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-02 20:29 ` marco at hulten dot org
2010-11-04  0:17 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-04  0:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-04  0:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-04  0:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-04  0:42 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101013214200.8bYcwAb8etf4klm49vXoSJznrV38LV0v_JJGsuXtt5Y@z \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).