From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-334038-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 839 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2010 21:22:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 829 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2010 21:22:17 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:22:12 +0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed LTO bootstrap test
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
In-Reply-To: <bug-46055-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46055-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:22:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg01427.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20101017212200.U1eNpYQRkQEShEAQSjrOQXAz1MnaC4D6e2Dtgk5hwFI@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055

--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2010-10-17 21:22:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I got
> 
> [hjl@gnu-32 prev-gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O2  /tmp/foo.i -fuse-linker-plugin 
> -fwhopr=jobserver
> [hjl@gnu-32 prev-gcc]$ cat /tmp/foo.i
> char pstat_getstatic ();
> char (*f) () = pstat_getstatic;
> int
> main ()
> {
>   return f != pstat_getstatic;
> }

This test may not be compatible with -fwhopr. Can we
use

--
char pstat_getstatic ();
int
main ()
{
  return pstat_getstatic != (void *) 1;
}
--

instead?