From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-334056-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16951 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2010 09:48:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 16942 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2010 09:48:57 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:48:53 +0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/46060] gfortran crash when referencing procedure pointer
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed
In-Reply-To: <bug-46060-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46060-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:48:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg01445.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20101018094800.rYR0Z47a5ji1VVuX3TT5IxD4u5bJFq8VvRpHp1Td_pk@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-invalid-code
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2010.10.18 09:48:42
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 09:48:42 UTC ---
Confirmed. Here is a slightly reduced test case:

implicit none

abstract interface
  function name_func (ivar) result (res)
    integer, intent(in) :: ivar
    character(len=8) :: res
  end function name_func
end interface

type var_type
  procedure(name_func), nopass, pointer :: name
end type var_type

type(var_type) :: vars
character(len=8) name

name = vars%name   ! invalid !!!

end


This, like the original code, is invalid and gives an ICE. Changing the invalid
line to something like

name = vars%name(3)

makes the ICE go away.