From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13885 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2010 15:56:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 13872 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2010 15:56:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:56:14 +0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug web/46064] have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: web X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg01489.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101018155600.JuUdhbq9lpgvTElY1M3CC8QHXB6gkQDjtCd-b3MgZ28@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46064 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-18 15:56:11 UTC --- I think this is the right thing to do. when bugs are marked as dups the majority of the time, we want an explication. Because if there was none; the reporter might open it back up (even then some of them do but that is a different issue all together). I think we should error on the side of cation here rather than have almost no feedback to the user of GCC.