From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20704 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2010 04:43:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 20694 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2010 04:43:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:42:57 +0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/46076] [4.6 regression] constant propagation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg01559.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101019044300.CIgpHe7YPCrpvMyXasJuWD3KHCaWSQFs0MivhyHnCEY@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-19 04:42:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I think both indirect inlining and constant propagation should be able to get > past the cast especially when there is no type mismatch in the testcase. Either try with (void) in the function declaration or try using the C++ front-end. () and (void) are different in C :).