From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31755 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2010 21:55:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 31741 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Oct 2010 21:55:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:55:40 +0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/36694] g++-4.2 rejects code, that other versions of gcc accept X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:55:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg01724.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101020215500.bqK7cXcxTQ_Kuh08KDFoPgu7rOIUvlI1PE6xgSyRw7o@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36694 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2010.10.20 21:55:26 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-20 21:55:26 UTC --- I can't compile the preprocessed source with GCC 4.4, but that's pretty normal for anything that includes boost because it uses so much conditional compilation. do you by any chance still have the origianl un-preprocessed source? if not, I don't think this will be fixed, gcc 4.2 is no longer supported so if it works with 4.3 (and I hope later versions) then it won't be fixed now