From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3991 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2010 14:04:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 3838 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2010 14:04:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:04:22 +0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/45827] mio_component_ref(): Component not found when mixing f90 and f03 in large projects X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:04:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg01791.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101021140400.WVSJ-Gi_bQShRizgrs5ZeRNbZpwRmyyK3RDGBROiHtE@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827 --- Comment #21 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-21 14:04:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > I fail to reproduce the ICE with today's r165769. Hans, are you still getting > this error? Frankly, I already got lost in comment 12 with regards to which version shows the bug and which doesn't. In light of comment 15 (cf. excerpt below) and given that there was no useful output with valgrind, I would suggest to close this PR as WORKSFORME. If the error re-appears, one can open a new PR. Hans, would it be OK to close the bug? (In reply to comment #15) > Revision 20100928 compiles my code, so it's fine for me now. But I have got > huge tables of use statements in my modules and I continue to get this error > message, when I forget to explicitly "use" the whole tree of modules. > > It also might has been a coincidence that the error disappeared when I renamed > kind.f90 to kinds.f03. I did the same for 20100928, and it didn't work. But > mentioning all modules works for 20100928.