From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14674 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2010 14:35:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14641 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2010 14:35:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:35:55 +0000 From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, monitored X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gdr at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: URL CC Known to fail In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:35:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg02307.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101027143500.JASaStVm3mXnDCELZzNw4kr-u2jJHYOGCfG_L2z85U0@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288 Peter Bergner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p | |atches/2010-03/msg00838.htm | |l CC| |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fail| | --- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner 2010-10-27 14:34:30 UTC --- Janis, I noticed your patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00838.html to fix this PR and PR18770 was approved by Jason here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00264.html Now that we're in 4.6 stage1, can we commit this patch to mainline?