public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-10-27 14:35 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-27 16:04 ` janis at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-27 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
| |atches/2010-03/msg00838.htm
| |l
CC| |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail| |
--- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-27 14:34:30 UTC ---
Janis, I noticed your patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00838.html
to fix this PR and PR18770 was approved by Jason here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00264.html
Now that we're in 4.6 stage1, can we commit this patch to mainline?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-27 14:35 ` [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-10-27 16:04 ` janis at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-27 17:27 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-27 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #13 from Janis Johnson <janis at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-27 16:04:10 UTC ---
It's fine with me to commit the patch, but can someone else do it? I wrote the
patch when I worked at IBM. I have a personal copyright assignment now, but
haven't been involved for several months and it would be a lot of work to get
set up to commit it myself.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-27 14:35 ` [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-27 16:04 ` janis at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-10-27 17:27 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-27 17:38 ` janis at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-27 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-27 17:26:27 UTC ---
I can do it, I just wanted to make sure I could. I'll apply the patch to
current mainline and give it another bootstrap regtesting before committing. I
assume I should use "Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>" as your email
address in the ChangeLog since that was what you used to submit the patch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-10-27 17:27 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-10-27 17:38 ` janis at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-20 17:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-27 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #15 from Janis Johnson <janis at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-27 17:38:36 UTC ---
Peter, I don't know what address you should use for me; ask on #gcc if you
should use the IBM one, otherwise it's janis.marie.johnson@gmail.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-10-27 17:38 ` janis at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-20 17:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-20 18:35 ` fang at csl dot cornell.edu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-20 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |howarth at nitro dot
| |med.uc.edu
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-20 17:09:41 UTC ---
*** Bug 49083 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-05-20 17:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-20 18:35 ` fang at csl dot cornell.edu
2011-05-20 19:15 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: fang at csl dot cornell.edu @ 2011-05-20 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #17 from David Fang <fang at csl dot cornell.edu> 2011-05-20 17:56:25 UTC ---
I usually catch these with -Wshadow -Werror.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-05-20 18:35 ` fang at csl dot cornell.edu
@ 2011-05-20 19:15 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-23 16:11 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-05 2:16 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-20 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18 from Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-20 18:34:08 UTC ---
Peter, can you apply Janis's patch now that we're in 4.7 stage 1?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-05-20 19:15 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-23 16:11 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-05 2:16 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-23 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #19 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 15:38:11 UTC ---
I applied Janis' patch (modulo a small fixup due to upstream changes) to
current mainline and did a bootstrap and regtest. We bootstrap fine,
unfortunately the patch no longer fixes the new added test case
(g++.dg/parse/pr18770.C) and the modified test case
(g++.old-deja/g++.jason/cond.C) also fails. I'm not really a C++ expert, so
I'm not sure what to do here.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-05-23 16:11 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-05 2:16 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-05 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #20 from Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-05 02:08:38 UTC ---
This bug was fixed on trunk in r174307; the automated update was not done
because something was wonky with my email. Closing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-17@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-23 20:40 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
@ 2010-02-23 21:54 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-23 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 21:54 -------
In response to comment #10, there are several duplicates to similar bug PR18770
and demand for a fix from within my company.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-17@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-23 19:08 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-23 20:40 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2010-02-23 21:54 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2010-02-23 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 20:40 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Is there a reason this hasn't been fixed?
Lack of public demand? There's only one duplicate of this bug that has
been reported in the last 9 years...
> If not, I'll try.
I think that would still be cool!
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-17@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-05-17 15:37 ` andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
2009-09-21 14:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-23 19:08 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-23 20:40 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2010-02-23 21:54 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-23 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 19:07 -------
Is there a reason this hasn't been fixed? If not, I'll try.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-17@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-05-17 15:37 ` andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
@ 2009-09-21 14:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-23 19:08 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-21 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 14:22 -------
*** Bug 41427 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ciobi at inbox dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <bug-2288-17@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2007-05-17 15:37 ` andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
2009-09-21 14:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: andrew dot stubbs at st dot com @ 2007-05-17 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com 2007-05-17 16:37 -------
Another example that might be of interest if anybody eventually tries to fix
this:
void
foo ()
{
for (int i = 0; int i = 0; i++) ;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <20010314065600.2288.gdr@codesourcery.com>
2003-05-24 22:22 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
@ 2005-05-31 13:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-31 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-31 13:16 -------
*** Bug 21837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ahelm at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope
[not found] <20010314065600.2288.gdr@codesourcery.com>
@ 2003-05-24 22:22 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2005-05-31 13:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia@physics.uc.edu @ 2003-05-24 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2003-05-05 00:00:00 |2003-05-24 21:29:46
date| |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-05-24 21:29 -------
still happens on the mainline (20030524).
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-05 2:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-2288-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-27 14:35 ` [Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-27 16:04 ` janis at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-27 17:27 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-27 17:38 ` janis at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-20 17:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-20 18:35 ` fang at csl dot cornell.edu
2011-05-20 19:15 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-23 16:11 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-05 2:16 ` froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
[not found] <bug-2288-17@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-05-17 15:37 ` andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
2009-09-21 14:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-23 19:08 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-23 20:40 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2010-02-23 21:54 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <20010314065600.2288.gdr@codesourcery.com>
2003-05-24 22:22 ` pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2005-05-31 13:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).