public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/46198] New: movd xmm, r (xmm -> GPR) may hit the stack
@ 2010-10-27 15:00 tbptbp at gmail dot com
2010-10-27 18:00 ` [Bug target/46198] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-10-27 18:10 ` tbptbp at gmail dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tbptbp at gmail dot com @ 2010-10-27 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46198
Summary: movd xmm, r (xmm -> GPR) may hit the stack
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: tbptbp@gmail.com
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Under somewhat elusive (target) conditions...
$ cat movd.c
#include <emmintrin.h>
int foo(__m128i x) { return _mm_cvtsi128_si32(x); }
$ gcc -O3 movd.c -S -o -
foo:
.LFB521:
.cfi_startproc
movd %xmm0, -12(%rsp)
movl -12(%rsp), %eax
ret
$ gcc -Os movd.c -S -o -
foo:
.LFB514:
.cfi_startproc
movd %xmm0, -12(%rsp)
movl -12(%rsp), %eax
ret
$ gcc -O3 -march=native movd.c -S -o -
foo:
.LFB521:
.cfi_startproc
movd %xmm0, %eax
ret
... movd may or may not pay a trip to the stack, apparently depending on some
target cpu+SSE level condition (here native is a corei7).
I can't see any good reason for that (and certainly not for size).
Known to happen from gcc 4.4.4 to
$ /usr/local/gcc-4.6-20101026/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/gcc-4.6-20101026/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-4.6-20101026/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.6.0
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=posix --disable-nls
--with-system-zlib --disable-bootstrap --enable-mpfr --enable-gold --enable-lto
--with-ppl --with-cloog --with-arch=native --enable-checking=release
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101026 (experimental) (GCC)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/46198] movd xmm, r (xmm -> GPR) may hit the stack
2010-10-27 15:00 [Bug target/46198] New: movd xmm, r (xmm -> GPR) may hit the stack tbptbp at gmail dot com
@ 2010-10-27 18:00 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-10-27 18:10 ` tbptbp at gmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2010-10-27 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46198
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2010-10-27 18:00:13 UTC ---
This is all what TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES is for. On AMD (and generic) targets,
TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES is disabled, for -march=core2 is enabled.
The situation is thus totally under control ;)
I recommend that you read [1], especially:
Part 2: Optimizing subroutines in assembly language: An optimization guide for
x86 platforms
Part 3: The microarchitecture of Intel, AMD and VIA CPUs: An optimization guide
for assembly programmers and compiler makers
Part 4: Instruction tables: Lists of instruction latencies, throughputs and
micro-operation breakdowns for Intel, AMD and VIA CPUs
[1] http://www.agner.org/optimize/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/46198] movd xmm, r (xmm -> GPR) may hit the stack
2010-10-27 15:00 [Bug target/46198] New: movd xmm, r (xmm -> GPR) may hit the stack tbptbp at gmail dot com
2010-10-27 18:00 ` [Bug target/46198] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2010-10-27 18:10 ` tbptbp at gmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tbptbp at gmail dot com @ 2010-10-27 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46198
--- Comment #2 from tbp <tbptbp at gmail dot com> 2010-10-27 18:10:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The situation is thus totally under control ;)
I concede you may have a point :)
Yet, for size builds, it really can't possibly make sense, ever (and that's
what lead me to investigate).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-27 18:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-27 15:00 [Bug target/46198] New: movd xmm, r (xmm -> GPR) may hit the stack tbptbp at gmail dot com
2010-10-27 18:00 ` [Bug target/46198] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-10-27 18:10 ` tbptbp at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).