From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-334986-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7135 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2010 05:46:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 7114 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2010 05:46:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:46:40 +0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed
In-Reply-To: <bug-46195-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46195-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:46:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg02375.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20101028054600.TZYJ_mVvOPON8maL6TN9npx5GVIboJARZ15hE1GL-Z0@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|2010-10-27 11:26:53         |2010.10.28 05:46:35
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2010-10-28 05:46:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Latest patch still leaves the regressions...
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18 c_compat_x_tst.o compile
> FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18 c_compat_y_tst.o compile
> FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18a c_compat_x_tst.o compile
> FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18a c_compat_y_tst.o compile
> 

Please provide preprocessed file which triggers the warning.