From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22324 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2010 10:14:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 22315 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2010 10:14:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:14:15 +0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC AssignedTo In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg02388.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101028101400.pLLI7txXEgnMbK03I5tgClGHJBSTvaBgYMqrRgOlcAE@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |bkoz at redhat dot com AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at oracle dot |unassigned at gcc dot |com |gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-28 10:14:02 UTC --- It's a mess: why n3126 doesn't have the store, atomic_store, and atomic_exchange tweaks, to name a few? Also, the compare_exchange_* are now overloaded, not just changed to take a const void*. And what about the atomic_address constructor from a void*? I don't think I'm going to work on this righ now... Adding Benjamin in CC, maybe he followed details of this..