From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-335024-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22729 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2010 15:33:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 22691 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2010 15:33:01 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:32:57 +0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
In-Reply-To: <bug-46196-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46196-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:33:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg02413.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20101028153300.yKxVny8ItasjTvP4kFx1REXRYR2WLOnQ4GmRitWyVM0@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196

--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-28 15:32:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> With the patch in comment #2, several of my codelets are rejected: for instance
> the test in comment #24 of pr42274 is rejected with:
> 
> [macbook] f90/bug% gfc pr42274_5.f90
> pr42274_5.f90:14.33:
> 
>     generic, public :: extract => make_integer_2
>                                  1
> Error: 'make_integer_2' and 'make_integer' for GENERIC 'extract' at (1) are
> ambiguous

Yes, this is expected. The test case is invalid.


> If you need I can sort out the other similar new errors tomorrow.

Maybe you could check if there are any 'false alarm' errors among that ...