public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:42:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20101029204200.2ZUo651rPpttAsBwbAvh_Bi4Dxk9tQPjCZg92a6aub8@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-46228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |missed-optimization Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-29 20:42:41 UTC --- Considering std::_Rb_tree<_Key, _Val, _KeyOfValue, _Compare, _Alloc>::~_Rb_tree() [with _Key = int, _Val = int, _KeyOfValue = std::_Identity<int>, _Compare = std::less<int>, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>] with 4 size to be inlined into int main() in /home/apinski/local-gcc/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/../../../../include/c++/4.6.0/bits/stl_set.h:87 Estimated growth after inlined into all callees is +2 insns. Estimated badness is 3, frequency 1.00. inline_failed:call is unlikely and code size would grow. ... Considering std::_Rb_tree<_Key, _Val, _KeyOfValue, _Compare, _Alloc>::~_Rb_tree() [with _Key = int, _Val = int, _KeyOfValue = std::_Identity<int>, _Compare = std::less<int>, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>] with 4 size to be inlined into int main() in /home/apinski/local-gcc/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/../../../../include/c++/4.6.0/bits/stl_set.h:87 Estimated growth after inlined into all callees is +2 insns. Estimated badness is 118, frequency 0.00. inline_failed:call is unlikely and code size would grow. I bet we don't take into account that the argument to ~_Rb_tree is an ADDR_EXPR. First I noticed it saying the call is unlikely which is true but the thing that is not true is the +2 insns; only because of the arguments being passed is an ADDR_EXPR of a component_ref of a var_decl. Maybe we should record if the only places pointer arguments are used is in MEM_REF/INDIRECT_REF's and then inline functions based on that fact if we have those arguments as a ADDR_EXPR of a decl.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-29 20:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-10-29 16:58 [Bug tree-optimization/46228] New: " zeev.tarantov at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 19:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/46228] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 20:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-10-29 20:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2010-10-29 20:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-29 23:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-29 23:45 ` zeev.tarantov at gmail dot com 2010-10-30 15:41 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 16:00 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-30 20:06 ` zeev.tarantov at gmail dot com 2010-11-04 4:44 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 17:32 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 20:11 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 20:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 20:27 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-11 0:43 ` zeev.tarantov at gmail dot com 2021-12-28 3:56 ` [Bug ipa/46228] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20101029204200.2ZUo651rPpttAsBwbAvh_Bi4Dxk9tQPjCZg92a6aub8@z \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).