From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9467 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2010 21:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9396 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Oct 2010 21:38:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:38:19 +0000 From: "sje at cup dot hp.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/46204] g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C fails to compile on IA64 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sje at cup dot hp.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Component Ever Confirmed In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:38:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg02524.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101029213800.6pk2h_QzZsQW_7C3E01AVfLcCfVK57x06cXXruDJUfQ@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204 Steve Ellcey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2010.10.29 21:38:07 CC| |abel at gcc dot gnu.org Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-29 21:38:07 UTC --- It looks like this is a bug in the selective scheduler. If I use -fno-selective-scheduling then the label in question is not removed and the program compiles correctly. Marking it as confirmed since I see it in H.J. and Andreas test runs sent to gcc-testresults.