From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3185 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2010 12:29:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 3175 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2010 12:29:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:29:38 +0000 From: "loose at astron dot nl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: loose at astron dot nl X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:29:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20101101122900.LafWeuno9Mwso_fPBrpDF0cSjuEnkPczR67Bp8HFf7w@z> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #3 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:29:27 UTC --- As far as I know attributes were removed from the C0x Final Draft. Besides, if GCC were to provide a compiler flag to warn for this, you would also be able to catch potential bugs in "old" code, or in code where the author was not explicit about overrides.