From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-335595-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30477 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2010 14:39:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 30465 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2010 14:39:54 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_MID
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:39:50 +0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/46289] [4.6 regression] ICE in build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at cp/semantics.c:5513
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
In-Reply-To: <bug-46289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:39:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20101103143900.liHvbRBSdrlLbf3reySaPuP2lTDHT3PIpjpzOgBi-OQ@z>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-03 14:39:33 UTC ---
Ah, I wondered about that syntax.  We now initialize the pthread_mutex_t member
like so:

mutex() : _M_mutex(PTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT) { }

which is not portable.  We could add config checks to determine where the INIT
macro is valid, and for some platforms we could use:

mutex() : _M_mutex PTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT { }

But the ideal solution is to get brace-or-equal-initializers implemented for
non-static class members, then we can do:

native_type _M_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT;
mutex() { }