public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
@ 2010-11-01 19:35 janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:43 ` [Bug fortran/46262] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-01 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected
function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: janus@gcc.gnu.org
The following code ICEs with current trunk:
module integrable_model_module
implicit none
type :: integrable_model
contains
procedure :: multiply
generic :: operator(*) => multiply
end type integrable_model
contains
subroutine integrate (model)
class(integrable_model) :: model
print *,d_dt(model)*2.0
end subroutine
function d_dt (this)
class(integrable_model), intent(in) :: this
class(integrable_model), allocatable :: d_dt
end function
real function multiply(lhs, rhs)
class(integrable_model), intent(in) :: lhs
real, intent(in) :: rhs
end function
end module
integrable_model.f03: In function ‘integrate’:
integrable_model.f03:15:0: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
function_type or method_type, have pointer_type in gimplify_call_expr, at
gimplify.c:2354
It is reported to work with 4.5.x and a 4.6 snapshot from 20100703.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-01 19:43 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:45 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-01 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:43:41 UTC ---
-fdump-tree-original shows wrong code being generated:
struct class$integrable_model_a <T3f8> (struct class$integrable_model &
restrict) D.1529;
static real(kind=4) C.1528 = 2.0e+0;
struct class$integrable_model_a D.1527;
D.1527 = d_dt ((struct class$integrable_model *) model);
D.1529 = d_dt (&D.1527, &C.1528);
_gfortran_transfer_real_write (&dt_parm.0, &D.1529, 4);
The second call to "d_dt" should actually be a call to
"D.1527->$vptr->multiply".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:43 ` [Bug fortran/46262] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-01 19:45 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-01 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:45:12 UTC ---
The following variant:
module integrable_model_module
implicit none
type :: integrable_model
contains
procedure :: multiply
generic :: operator(*) => multiply
end type integrable_model
contains
subroutine integrate (model)
class(integrable_model) :: model
real :: r
r = d_dt(model)*2.0
end subroutine
function d_dt (this)
class(integrable_model), intent(in) :: this
class(integrable_model), allocatable :: d_dt
end function
real function multiply(lhs, rhs)
class(integrable_model), intent(in) :: lhs
real, intent(in) :: rhs
end function
end module
yields:
integrable_model.f03: In function ‘integrate’:
integrable_model.f03:16:0: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:1934
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:43 ` [Bug fortran/46262] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:45 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-01 19:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-02 3:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-01 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:49:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 22222
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22222
full test case
When fixing, one should make sure that the full code from
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1644001.1644004
also works (attached). Originally reported by Ralph Kube at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00003.html.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-01 19:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-02 3:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-02 5:22 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-02 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-02 03:33:35 UTC ---
I have a regression hunt running.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-02 3:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-02 5:22 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-02 7:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-02 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-02 05:22:42 UTC ---
Passes at r162312 and fails at r162313.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-02 5:22 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-02 7:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-03 15:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-02 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 07:29:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Passes at r162312 and fails at r162313.
Thanks for checking, Jerry. r162313 was Paul's fix for PR42385 ("poylmorphic
operators do not work"):
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=162313
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-02 7:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-03 15:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-03 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-03 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-03 15:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-03 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-28 15:48 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-03 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-03 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-28 15:48 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-28 16:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-28 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-28 15:23:56 UTC ---
I believe I have this isolated to the changes in resolve.c
Eliminating those changes in the offending patch eliminates the ICE. Of
course, though the code compiles, it does not link.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-28 15:48 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-28 16:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-05 9:35 ` [Bug fortran/46262] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-28 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-28 15:52:06 UTC ---
Specifically, this line is involved with the problem.
Index: resolve.c
===================================================================
--- resolve.c (revision 167220)
+++ resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -5739,7 +5739,6 @@ resolve_typebound_function (gfc_expr* e)
e->symtree = expr->symtree;
e->ref = gfc_copy_ref (expr->ref);
gfc_add_vptr_component (e);
- gfc_add_component_ref (e, name);
e->value.function.esym = NULL;
return SUCCESS;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-28 16:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-05 9:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-07 8:39 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-05 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree |[OOP] tree check: expected
|check: expected |function_type or
|function_type or |method_type, have
|method_type, have |pointer_type
|pointer_type |
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05 09:33:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> -fdump-tree-original shows wrong code being generated:
>
>
> struct class$integrable_model_a <T3f8> (struct class$integrable_model &
> restrict) D.1529;
> static real(kind=4) C.1528 = 2.0e+0;
> struct class$integrable_model_a D.1527;
>
> D.1527 = d_dt ((struct class$integrable_model *) model);
> D.1529 = d_dt (&D.1527, &C.1528);
> _gfortran_transfer_real_write (&dt_parm.0, &D.1529, 4);
>
>
> The second call to "d_dt" should actually be a call to
> "D.1527->$vptr->multiply".
Note that 4.5 also produces wrong code here:
real(kind=4) D.1560;
static real(kind=4) C.1559 = 2.0e+0;
struct .class.integrable_model.a D.1558;
D.1558 = d_dt ((struct .class.integrable_model *) model);
D.1560 = multiply (&D.1558, &C.1559);
_gfortran_transfer_real (&dt_parm.0, &D.1560, 4);
It has a static call to 'multiply', instead of a polymorphic call via the vptr.
So, since 4.5 also does not handle the test case correctly, I think it's fair
to remove the "regression" tag.
In a way one could even argue that the ICE in 4.6 is an improvement over 4.5
silently giving wrong results for such cases, since the user does at least get
*some* error message (even though a crude and uninformative one), instead of
assuming the feature was supported and getting wrong results in the end!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-05 9:35 ` [Bug fortran/46262] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-07 8:39 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-22 14:54 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-07 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dominique.pelletier at
| |polymtl dot ca
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07 08:39:23 UTC ---
*** Bug 48011 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-07 8:39 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-22 14:54 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-25 21:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-22 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.03.22 14:44:00
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-22 14:54 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-25 21:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-28 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-25 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.6.1
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-25 19:53:03 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.0 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-25 21:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-28 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 12:48 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 13:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-28 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2011-04-28 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-02 12:48 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 13:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-02 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-02 12:46:15 UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 2 12:46:08 2012
New Revision: 182796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182796
Log:
2012-01-02 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/51529
* trans-array.c (gfc_array_allocate): Null allocated memory of
newly allocted class arrays.
PR fortran/46262
PR fortran/46328
PR fortran/51052
* interface.c(build_compcall_for_operator): Add a type to the
expression.
* trans-expr.c (conv_base_obj_fcn_val): New function.
(gfc_conv_procedure_call): Use base_expr to detect non-variable
base objects and, ensuring that there is a temporary variable,
build up the typebound call using conv_base_obj_fcn_val.
(gfc_trans_class_assign): Pick out class procedure pointer
assignments and do the assignment with no further prcessing.
(gfc_trans_class_array_init_assign, gfc_trans_class_init_assign
gfc_trans_class_assign): Move to top of file.
* gfortran.h : Add 'base_expr' field to gfc_expr.
* resolve.c (get_declared_from_expr): Add 'types' argument to
switch checking of derived types on or off.
(resolve_typebound_generic_call): Set the new argument.
(resolve_typebound_function, resolve_typebound_subroutine):
Set 'types' argument for get_declared_from_expr appropriately.
Identify base expression, if not a variable, in the argument
list of class valued calls. Assign it to the 'base_expr' field
of the final expression. Strip away all references after the
last class reference.
2012-01-02 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/46262
PR fortran/46328
PR fortran/51052
* gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_7.f03: New.
* gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_8.f03: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_7.f03
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_8.f03
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/46262] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-02 12:48 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-02 13:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-02 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-02 13:03:12 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks to everybody for the reports and testcases.
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-02 13:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-01 19:35 [Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:43 ` [Bug fortran/46262] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:45 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-01 19:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-02 3:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-02 5:22 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-02 7:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-03 15:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-03 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-28 15:48 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-28 16:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-05 9:35 ` [Bug fortran/46262] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-07 8:39 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-22 14:54 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-25 21:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-28 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 12:48 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 13:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).