From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-337712-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 539 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2010 10:57:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 521 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2010 10:57:54 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ksp.mff.cuni.cz (HELO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.26.206)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:57:50 +0000
Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 4018)	id C75F7F2C66; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:57:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:58:00 -0000
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug middle-end/46554] Less inlining leads to CSiBE regression
Message-ID: <20101119105747.GB5876@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <bug-46554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> <bug-46554-4-EWYn7aIFbA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bug-46554-4-EWYn7aIFbA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg02445.txt.bz2

> I thought partial inlining would maybe fix this?  Otherwise it's really a
> case that needs IP analysis.

Not with -Os, we really know that it will optimize away.

Honza